Companions of William the Conqueror

William the Conqueror had men of diverse standing and origins in France, under his command at the Battle of Hastings in 1066, along with others completing his Norman conquest of England until after the Harrying of the North and before the Anarchy.

The term “Companions of the Conqueror” in the widest sense signifies those who planned, organised and joined with William the Conqueror, Duke of Normandy, in the great adventure which was the Norman Conquest of England (1066–1071). The term is however more narrowly defined as those nobles who actually fought with Duke William in the Battle of Hastings.[2] This article is concerned with the latter narrow definition.

Contents

Proof versus legend

Many ancient English families of Norman origin have claimed amongst their ancestors a participant at the Battle of Hastings as a matter of great pride giving them legitimacy in the higher echelons of the British aristocracy. The large majority of these claims are based on legend and cannot be proven by historical evidence.

Many hundreds of Norman nobles of varying degrees certainly fought with the Duke at Hastings, yet the fact remains that the names of only 15 of these are recorded in contemporary historical sources considered to be unimpeachable.[4] This very select group is therefore known as the “Proven Companions”,[5] as distinct from the several hundred “Likely”, “Probable” or “Possible” Companions. Many lists and "rolls" of so-called Companions have been drawn up over the ages, and continue so to be, yet the 3 unimpeachable sources remain as follows:

Unimpeachable sources

The following 3 sources constitute the only generally accepted reliable contemporary evidence which names participants at the Battle of Hastings. Between all three sources only 15 names result.[7]

List of 15 "Proven Companions"

(The order of listing is that given in the respective sources)

"A certain Norman, Robert, son of Roger of Beaumont, being nephew and heir to Henry, Count of Meulan, through Henry's sister Adeline, found himself that day in battle for the first time. He was as yet but a young man and he performed feats of valour worthy of perpetual remembrance. At the head of a troop which he commanded on the right wing he attacked with the utmost bravery and success".[9]

"With a harsh voice he (Duke William) called to Eustace of Boulogne, who with 50 knights was turning in flight and was about to give the signal for retreat. This man came up to the Duke and said in his ear that he ought to retire since he would court death if he went forward. But at the very moment when he uttered the words Eustace was struck between the shoulders with such force that blood gushed out from his mouth and nose and half dead he only made his escape with the aid of his followers".[10]

"There were present in this battle: Eustace, Count of Boulogne; William, son of Richard, Count of Evreux; Geoffrey, son of Rotrou, Count of Mortagne; William FitzOsbern; Haimo, Vicomte of Thouars; Walter Giffard; Hugh of Montfort-sur-Risle; Rodulf of Tosny; Hugh of Grantmesnil; William of Warenne, and many other most renowned warriors whose names are worthy to be commemorated in histories among the bravest soldiers of all time".[11]

"His (King Harold's) corpse was brought into the Duke's camp and William gave it for burial to William, surnamed Malet, and not to Harold's mother, who offered for the body of her beloved son its weight in gold".[12]

"Hic Odo Eps (Episcopus) Baculu(m) Tenens Confortat Pueros". (Here Odo the Bishop holding a club strengthens the boys).[13]

Sources of secondary merit

Sources for this article

External sources

Further reading

References

  1. ^ Attribution to Eustace of this person depicted in the Bayeux Tapestry given by Douglas (1959), p.238, re plate LXXIII
  2. ^ As for example defined by Cokayne's Complete Peerage, revised edition, vol. 12, postscript to Appendix L, pp.47-48: “Companions of the Conqueror”
  3. ^ Douglas (1959), p.238
  4. ^ Douglas (1959) states the number of proven companions to be less than 35, but does not list them: "Express evidence vouching the presence of particular persons at Hastings can be found in the case of less than 35 persons" (p.227, footnote 2
  5. ^ Cokayne's Peerage, op.cit.
  6. ^ This explanation of the club was proposed by Douglas (1959), p.238
  7. ^ Other names are provided which feature before or after the Battle
  8. ^ Histoire de la Normandie, éd. Guizot, Caen, 1825-1827. Accès en ligne BnF (4 vol.); Tome I, Tome II, Tome III, Tome IV
  9. ^ Wm. of Poitiers, per Douglas (1959), p.227
  10. ^ Wm. of Poitiers, per Douglas (1959), pp.228-9
  11. ^ Wm. of Poitiers, per Douglas (1959), pp. 227-8
  12. ^ Wm. of Poitiers, per Douglas (1959), p.229. Malet is not described by Wm. of Poitiers as active during the battle, but rather as present in the Duke's camp after the battle. This should suffice to deem him a participant in the battle.
  13. ^ Bayeux Tapestry, embroidered annotation above and forward between horses' legs
  14. ^ Alternatively Toustain the Fair/White, FitzRou, son of Rou/Rolf. Said to have come from Bec, Pays de Caux
  15. ^ Les cronicques de Normendie, Guillaume Le Talleur, Rouen, 1487. En ligne sur bnf.fr, voir paragraphe cxxxviii, p.115-116.
  16. ^ Raphael Holinshed, Chronicles of England, Scotland and Ireland, first published in London, 1577. Further edition of 1587 : Holinshed’s chronicles of England, Scotland, and Ireland, J. Johnson & Co., London, 1805: le projet Gutenberg.